Re: [LAU] JACK freewheel mode: disadvantages?

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Mar 02 2016 - 04:32:15 EET

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:31 PM, jonetsu@email-addr-hidden <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden>
wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 00:56:57 +0100
> Robin Gareus <robin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > How about using a GNU/Linux distribution that does not ship a 2 1/2
> > year old versions of jackd?
>
> No way. I do not want to install a new OS anytime soon. This LM 17
> works fine and is supported until 2019 security-wise. (Hopefully no
> malware will come through the updates since LM was hacked seriously
> recently.)
>

Except ... it doesn't work fine, because it has a 2-1/2 year old version of
JACK :)

>
> > No drawbacks. Except you'll have to stop jackd if you want to use the
> > same device as jackd is using.
>
> > There's also a "None (Dummy)" audio system which does not need an
> > actual device, but this only available if Ardour was configured
> > with
> > ./waf configure --with-backends=jack,alsa,dummy
> >
> > (Ardour4 debug builds from http://nightly.ardour.org/ have this
> > enabled).
>
> Thanks for the details. Can this dummy option be used for exports and
> will it be in the next Ardour release ?

As Robin explained, the "dummy" backend is in *debug* builds on the nightly
site. We do not include it in normal releases.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Mar 2 08:15:01 2016

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 02 2016 - 08:15:01 EET