Re: [LAU] multiJACK patch management: the first glimmerings of success

From: Markus Seeber <markus.seeber@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Apr 03 2016 - 13:49:24 EEST

On 04/02/2016 06:52 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 04/02/2016 06:33 PM, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
>> For those who may be interested, I am seeing the first small glimmering
>> of what looks like real success, in running multiple JACK servers on one
>> box for the purpose of distributing DSP load.
>
> I had to double check that it's not April 1st anymore :)
>
> If running multiple synchronous instances of jack has lower DSP load
> than single instance, something is very very wrong.
>
> 2c,
> robin
>

Sounds like poor man's interleaved scheduling? Except very painful?

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Apr 3 16:15:03 2016

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 03 2016 - 16:15:03 EEST