Re: [LAU] multiJACK patch management: the first glimmerings of success

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Apr 06 2016 - 01:34:26 EEST

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Alexandre DENIS <contact@email-addr-hidden>
wrote:

>
> Jack2 cannot parallelize processing if the graph is a pipeline: since
> every stage depends on the data from previous stage, they must be run
> in sequence.
>
> However, a pipeline may be parallelized if you trade parallelism
> against latency. You can run each stage in parallel if they process
> data from different periods.

if you use netjack1, this does not happen. both ends of a netjack
connection (1 master and N slaves) are synced to the same master sample
clock.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Apr 6 04:15:01 2016

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 06 2016 - 04:15:01 EEST