On 04/08/2016 02:13 AM, jonetsu@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:58:54 -1000
> david <gnome@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 04/07/2016 01:40 AM, jonetsu@email-addr-hidden wrote:
>
>>> Otherwise it is like taking pictures using an expensive camera and
>>> having the film developed at the drugstore.
>
>> Seriously, I've done that and gotten pretty good development from the
>> drugstore. All depends on how new their development system is and how
>> good their techs maintain it. ;)
>
> There are no set rules. I remember taking stunningly nice (colours,
> feeling, etc...) pictures with a throw-away camera. The actual
> cheeziness of the device brought a very nice touch. That was 3
> pictures out of the device that were so. The others were crap, but
> nevertheless.
>
> So then, the usage of all these fancy electrons mean nothing :)
The good techs probably use optimized bits and carefully-aligned
single-quantum state electrons, too. ;)
-- David W. Jones gnome@email-addr-hidden authenticity, honesty, community http://dancingtreefrog.com _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sat Apr 9 08:15:01 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 09 2016 - 08:15:02 EEST