On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 00:33:27 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
>On 06/05/2016 12:19 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 22:12:24 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
>>> great emotional impact on audience does not require great emotional
>>> investment of performer/author.
>>
>> To decide to make music, because you like this kind of art is
>> emotional. Why don't we play soccer, run amok, plant a tree at the
>> time we decide to make music? We decide to make music, experienced a
>> sunset, by love,
>
> why did you remove the part when I write about how the author might
>not be human or intelligent in any sense at all (flower, sunset etc.).
>That was the point.
The sunset happens without intelligence or emotion at all and there's
no doubt that it could cause emotions to somebody watching the sunset.
>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 22:16:53 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
>emotions only come up in systems that are complex enough (that
>doesn't mean that all complex systems would have emotions, just that
>the current AI is too simple to have emotions and that complex enough
>AI *might* eventually have emotions).
Emotions are required, they fulfil a "function" of life. they are the
cause to protect ourself, to be kindhearted, human etc., nothing like
that is required for a machine to exist. The sunset itself doesn't make
music, even the flower, a living being doesn't make music.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Jun 5 12:15:03 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jun 05 2016 - 12:15:03 EEST