Re: [LAU] The future of audio plugins ?

Of course audio engineers would think something which could potentially put
them out of work was stupid (or something they *think* could never put them
out of work). What does the AI community think of it though?

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden>
wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:25:26PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > The audio engineer with the promotionally effective name demands
> > another audio engineer for this kind of assistance. IOW a human does
> > the mix and another human does the fine tuning. This is quasi the
> > counterpart of what Fons already mentioned. Let iZotope's Track
> > Assitant/Neutron do the mix, then use iZotope's Track Assitant/Neutron
> > to do the fine tuning of the mix it produced before.
>
> I spent most the evening with a group a sound engineers, discussing
> things ranging from mixing desk ergonomics to how to approach a
> particular mix that our host presented as an example of his work.
>
> Inspired by this thread, I dared to coin the question 'how would
> you feel about an EQ plugin that analyses the track it's in, gets
> information from its peers in other tracks, and then adjusts itself ?'
>
> Result: general hilarity. Consensus was that this the most stupid
> thing ever suggested. Had to take some action to avoid damage to
> my own reputation.
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Oct 20 00:15:04 2016