Re: [LAU] RT kernel

i'm just wondering why you'd bother to set HZ when the preferred
configuration is NO_HZ .. ?

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On 11/04/2016 09:24 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@email-addr-hidden
> > <mailto:rncbc@email-addr-hidden>> wrote:
> >
> > echo "CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y" >> .config
> > echo "CONFIG_HZ_1000=y" >> .config
> >
> > surely a tickless kernel is much better on almost any vaguely modern
> > hardware?
> >
>
> none of the above abstains you from a tickless kernel
>
> CONFIG_NO_HZ and CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE are untouched, as far as `make
> oldconfig` goes
>
> cheers
> --
> rncbc aka. Rui Nuno Capela
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Nov 5 04:15:02 2016