On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:59:27 +0100, Kjetil Matheussen wrote:
>> The English Wiki disagrees with your claim that w64 files are limited
>> to 2.1G(B, the Wiki likely mean GiB, the OP perhaps GB), even wav
>> seems not to be limited to 2.1G(B|GiB).
>
>I did not claim either of this.
The OP claims that no files larger than 2.1G were produced when using
libsndfile.
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:05:24 +0100, you claimed:
>libsndfile is not the limiting factor. It's the wav format that doesn't
>support large files.
In the context your claim actually is, that the wav formats are the
culprit. Regarding the Wiki, for what the OP wants to get, the
limitation is not caused by the two wav formats.
However, it doesn't matter what you wanted to point out, important only
is that, if neither libsndfile, nor wav does cause the issue the OP
experienced, then something else most cause the trouble. Right?
Regards,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Nov 8 20:15:02 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 08 2016 - 20:15:02 EET