On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 22:26 +0100, Markus Seeber wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 04:17 PM, Tino Mettler wrote:
> > My test setup the card clocked at 48 kHz and the AES input and
> > output
> > looped.
>
>
> Which means you connected the digital output to the digital input I
> guess?
Yes.
> Do you count "channel 9 and 10" one or zero indexed? :)
>
> Here is the channel mapping from the source for reference:
>
> static char channel_map_H9632_ss[HDSP_MAX_CHANNELS] = {
> /* ADAT channels */
> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
> /* SPDIF */
> 8, 9,
One indexed.
> Depending on what you "mean" with "the result" this looks perfectly
> fine
> to me. To be expected of a sampled square wave signal.
>
> How did you generate the signal?
> How did you measure/visualize the output?
Maybe I was a bit unclear. I generated a square sample and saved it
into a .wav file, as 48 kHz/16 bit/stereo. I expected to see the same
PCM data when recording it.
> If you want to check bit transparency, you need to compare the
> samples
> of your digital input and output.
I thought I did exactly that, or do you mean I need to compare the
physical signal on the cable?
> I don't see any reason why it would not work if you connect the
> digital
> output to the digital input.
Actually, a colleague of mine did exactly that in Windows, using
another RME card.
Here are example screenshots of the original and the recording:
https://tikei.de/playback.png
https://tikei.de/recording.png
Regards,
Tino
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Nov 18 20:15:02 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 18 2016 - 20:15:02 EET