Re: [LAU] jack, pulse = confusion, at least for me

As already pointed out earlier, when you randomly replied off-list, in
my experiences it's easier to use just jackd without anything else [1].

    From another off-list reply:
    Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:44:14 -0400
    From: Mac <ussndmac@charter.net>
    To: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
    Subject: Re: [LAU] jack, pulse = confusion, at least for me

    [snip]

    If I understand correctly, if you want system sound to go to jack,
    you need a some bridge, a2j, pulse, etc. not matter what jack you
    use.

    [snip]

Yesno, see

[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ apropos a2j
a2j (1) - Wrapper script to simulate a2jmidid's non-DBUS behaviour though a2jmidid actually being...
a2j_control (1) - utility to control a2jmidid daemon
a2jmidi_bridge (1) - static bridge with one ALSA playback port and one JACK MIDI input port
a2jmidid (1) - JACK MIDI daemon for ALSA MIDI
zita-a2j (1) - Use ALSA device as a Jack client, with resampling.

Also consider to take a look at the JACK FAQ:
"How can I play audio from …. via JACK?" - http://www.jackaudio.org/faq/

Regards,
Ralf

    [1]
    Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:02:50 +0100
    From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
    To: Mac <ussndmac@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: [LAU] jack, pulse = confusion, at least for me

    On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:56:21 -0400, Mac wrote:
>It's all good...just complicated. :)

    Hi,

    was it intended to sent the reply off-list?

    IMO it's less complicated without jackdbus and pulseaudio. YMMV!

    Good luck!
    Ralf
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Mar 15 00:15:01 2017