Am 02.04.2017 um 19:42 schrieb Bernardo Barros:
> On 4/2/17 1:34 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Christopher only mentioned, that it's not wise to have a hard dependency
>> on something that isn't official released.
> What if that's the only way? "Program in a way that it doesn't the git
> version"(?) It don't think it's a wise suggestion either without looking
> for the reasons they did it.
>
>
I would never "release" with a dependency to unreleased software. You
still cant consider it a release.
Software in git could change and render your release unusable without
give users a chance to know what going on.
As already suggested, if you in the need and hurry, include the
git-version you depend on within your release tarball is the way to go.
just my 2 cent
hermann
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Apr 3 00:15:02 2017
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 03 2017 - 00:15:02 EEST