Re: [LAU] limits.conf nice rtprio

OMFG.

How many years have to go by before people stop thinking that nice values
have anything to do with this?

http://jackaudio.org/faq/linux_rt_config.html

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mikes@email-addr-hidden.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am afraid that I still don't understand limits.conf file properly.
> Hopefully someone can explain me some details.
> I have limits.conf file like this:
>
> @mira - rtprio 99
> @mira - memlock 8000000
> @mira - nice -10
>
> @mira /usr/bin/jackd nice=-1 rtprio=85
> @mira /usr/bin/qjackctl nice=-1 rtprio=84
> @mira /usr/bin/ardour nice=-1 rtprio=83
> @mira /usr/bin/hydrogen nice=-1 rtprio=82
> @mira /usr/bin/jackeq nice=-1 rtprio=81
> @mira /usr/bin/jack-rack nice=-1 rtprio=80
> .
> .
>
> Should I do something better with nice and rtprrio values to ensure better
> RT robustness ?
> There is also possible add "priority" value in limits.conf file ... Should
> I use it?
>
> 2nd question:
> In qjackctrl Settings -> Advanced ... there is a "Priority" option ...
> How it is connected with these above? Should be used?
>
> mira
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Aug 17 20:15:01 2017