Len Ovens <len@email-addr-hidden> writes:
[...]
> I do not know if these things will help, I have run a headless session
> complete with dbus, pulseaudio, jackdbus and various other audio
> applications... I really didn't need PA and therefore could have run
> without the dbus stuff. It was more of an experiment to see what I
> could do and the headless box had less than 1/4Gb of ram anyway, so it
> was not practical for real use. I should try setting up a headless
> jackd box on something newer though where I can make real use of it.
I didn't know that PulseAudio was the only thing that wanted Jack to be
controlled by DBus. (Somehow, that's not surprising though.) I'm not
using PulseAudio either, so would it be recommended to build jack2 (SMP
flavor) with no DBus support and just run it as a regular daemon in that
case?
-- - Brent Busby + =============================================== + With the rise of social networking -- Studio -- + sites, computers are making people -- Amadeus -- + easier to use every day. ----------------+ =============================================== _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Tue Oct 10 04:15:03 2017
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 10 2017 - 04:15:03 EEST