Re: [LAU] FOSS DAW recommendations

From: Robert Edge <thumbknucklerocks@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Nov 17 2017 - 09:23:17 EET

Latency compensation? - Sure, if I sit down at a DAW in 2017 I want to be
able to assume that latency, both in processing blocks in the machine and
with hardware is compensated for appropriately. Of course you want that.
Why would you NOT want to be able to not think about it and assume that
everything s time correct? With Ardour it is (mostly).

Subgroups - Absolutely. If you are dealing with any non-trivial project
you might want to group some audio together. Of course you want to be able
to make a sub group if you happen to need one.

You are talking about really fundamental, basic type stuff that a DAW is
used for. Ardour does all that stuff. If things become even less trivial
it does a bunch of other stuff too.

I'm a MIxbus user, but I've been keeping a current build from GIT since
forever, just to follow how it's going. If the builds from Ardour.org are
as solid as Mixbus, it should 'just work' on any reasonable linux system.
It is my understanding that they are.

Ardour is really the only game in town. It's a bummer, but that's where we
are with Linux Audio in 2017.

If what you want is a DAW.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Nov 17 12:15:02 2017

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 17 2017 - 12:15:02 EET