Re: [LAU] Massive Xruns during recording

From: Jeanette C. <julien@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Nov 30 2017 - 19:55:03 EET

Nov 30 2017, Peter has written:

> Dear Jeanette,
>
> as David pointed as, as long as you don't need a low latency
> for monitoring or real-time effects, there's no reason
> against a larger buffer.
I just tried a JACK period size of 1024, with the result of no xruns,
but also much too much latency. Since I have to monitor everything
through my soundcard and also receive guidance from previously recorded
tracks that will sadly be not a feasible solution.
...
> of 0.1s wouldn't hurt if it is sufficient to look at the meters
> simultaneously
Ah and there would be an additional snag. :) But for mixing a higher
delay is not a problem at all. Due to my recording environment and the
fact that I do studio work only, I do not work very "live".
...

--------
* website: http://juliencoder.de - for summer is a state of sound
* SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/jeanette_c

With you I get so high
Lost in the crystal sky
You are this melody
That's where you take me <3
(Britney Spears)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Nov 30 20:15:02 2017

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 30 2017 - 20:15:02 EET