Thanks everyone for your replies.
I had an idea that the low resolution was a compromise against bandwidth, so
thanks for the confirmation. When I started out dabbling with electronics in
the 1960s, I built a scope from a Practical Wireless design, which had a 2 inch
tube and a whole 100kHz bandwidth :)
It survived many years of service.
I do actually have a bitscope. It's interesting for what it is, but with no
proper attenuator, it's not terribly useful. The vertical resolution is poor
enough to make it pretty useless for checking things like cross-over distortion.
I've look araound for 'real' scopes and the best (at the top of my price limit)
my price range seems to be Siglent Technologies SDS1202X-E.
It's still only 8bit but the traces they show look better than most -
presumably due to clever fft stuff.
This is also very close to the price of a new CRT scope - I wouldn't trust
buying a S/H one. For a start, you've no idea of condition of the CRT until you
switch it on.
Back to possibly using a soundcard, I would be thinking of using my KA6, and put
a fairly simple buffer on the front. I'm not concerned about AC coupling. I can
get better results for DC with a millivoltmenter (of which I have two!).
I have tried Xscope, but it doesn't seem to see a soundcard at all, Not eveing
the crappy on-board one :(
-- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Mon Jun 18 21:50:32 2018
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 18 2018 - 21:50:33 EEST