Re: [LAU] Microphone advice

Depending on budget and expected output you might consider something like a
Zoom H4n or a Tascam DR05. You don't need an interface, they record direct
to SD Card ... the quality is amazingly good. Yes, you can do better
quality with dedicated mics, but you will need more budget, and time and
expertise for setup.

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Chris Caudle <chris@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Sun, April 22, 2018 10:55 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > the best compromise is to buy a matched pair of small diameter
> > condenser microphones. They are allrounder, not always the best choice,
> > especially not in the lower price segment, but again, they are the best
> > compromise for recording
>
> I will say I generally agree with Ralf's assessment, with one difference:
>
> > The polar pattern cardioid (kidney) is a good compromise.
>
> Off-axis response is very difficult to get consistent, and because of the
> physics of directional microphones the microphone will always be less
> directional at low frequencies. The most consistent sound quality,
> particularly with lower cost microphones, will typically be with an
> omnidirectional pattern. That does mean that you have to experiment a bit
> more with distance to the instrument if wall reflections in a small-ish
> room can be a problem, but it also means that there is less change in
> instrument timbre with distance (because of the way directional
> microphones work there is a distance where they begin to boost lower
> frequencies).
> That can be a downside for voice, especially male voice, many people like
> the way that directional microphones boost the lower mid frequencies, it
> makes a male voice sound bigger.
>
> Omni mics are also a little more difficult to setup for more distant
> stereo mic'ing, like you might use for a chamber group or small orchestra.
> You will probably have to place the pair a little closer than you would
> with directional mics, and you will probably want a baffle between the
> mics to increase stereo separation.
>
> With those caveats in mind, the positives are more consistent timbral
> quality with changes in distance, less coloration of room reflections (a
> directional mic will tend to pick up more bass off axis and less treble,
> so the reflected room sound can be bass heavy or boomy), and possibly
> slightly higher quality at a particular price point because of the less
> complicated assembly compared to a ported backplate cardioid mic.
>
> --
> Chris Caudle
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

-- 
**** Listen to my FREE CD at http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars ****
Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA **
EMAIL: bob@email-addr-hidden
WWW:   http://www.mellowood.ca

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Jun 18 21:52:46 2018