Le Fri, 7 Sep 2018 08:29:45 -0400,
jonetsu <jonetsu@teksavvy.com> a écrit :
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 14:25:04 +0200
> Daniel Swärd <excds@kth.se> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 07:36 -0400, jonetsu wrote:
> > > And I got pages full of links to many Reda articles, including the
> > > one she proclaims was blocked.
> > >
> > > Maybe I did something wrong.
> >
> > No, you didn't do anything wrong. It was blocked previously, but it
> > got fixed.
> >
> > The whole point was the irony of an article about automated
> > censorship machines got blocked by such a machine...
>
> It's not a good test at all I find. Why would someone input the full
> URL in a text search box as a test ? Is that supposed to mimic the
> public access to information ? No. Very, very strange way of proving
> any point at all. The lady might have good arguments, I haven't read,
> but this test is very much on the lame side of things I find. Why
> would someone with solid arguments do such a test ?
Maybe because she is some geek using some well know open source OS with
so many different tool-kits than when she's clicking on an url, she
never knows what will append.
>
> It does not represent public access to information at all.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
-- If you have a problem and you are not doing anything to fix it, you are at the heart of the problem. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Tue Sep 11 00:15:01 2018
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 11 2018 - 00:15:02 EEST