Re: [LAU] Can netjack1/2 over a direct ethernet connection substitute for local ALSA audio?

From: crocket <crockabiscuit@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 29 2019 - 01:34:55 EET

Although I may not use jack servers, I want to address a few concerns.

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 12:46 AM Len Ovens <len@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> This means you desktop
> relies on your Pi for a solid sync... if you are usng your desktop audio
> for anything important that requires solid sync, I would use the local
> device as backend and use zita-njbridge to join the two jack servers on
> the two machines.
>

I don't know what you mean by solid sync. According to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AptX#aptX_Low_Latency
40ms latency seems to be the threshold beyond which humans detect
synchronization issues when they watch videos.

> No problem (no skype either, but you may not need it) Lots of people use a
> jack to alsa bridge
>

The new skype client can use either ALSA, JACK, or pulseaudio.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Mar 29 04:15:02 2019

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 29 2019 - 04:15:02 EET