Re: [LAU] Berlin Linux Audio meeting @ c-base 2019-11-12

On 12/11/19 11:20, Louigi Verona wrote:
> I meant DSP quality.

It would be interesting, if this is actually discussed, if outcomes
could be shared on LAU ML. In particular also what the metrics for
assessment/comparison were/are

Lorenzo.

>
> Louigi Verona
> https://louigiverona.com/
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:08 AM Daniel Swärd <excds@kth.se
> <mailto:excds@kth.se>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 10:09 +0100, Hermann Meyer wrote:
> > Am 12.11.19 um 09:52 schrieb Daniel Swärd:
> > > I on the other hand was wondering if there's a Linux VST for
> > > convolution reverb so we could test out the Teufelsberg impulse
> > > responses in the soundlab:
> > >
> > >
> http://www.balancemastering.com/blog/free-teufelsberg-nsa-listening-tower-impulse-responses-ir-irs-convolution/
> > >
> > >     /Daniel
> >
> >
> > There is a convolution reverb in the LSP bundle, available as LV2 and
> > VST.
>
> Ah, nice. Then I'll have to check that out tonight. :-)
>
> Thanks.
>
>         /Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
> <mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org>
> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Jan 1 02:16:44 2020