Re: [LAU] Jack 1 vs. 2

From: Max <abonnements@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Feb 08 2021 - 17:14:10 EET

Interesting thread.
Out of curiosity: How does pipewire relate here? Since it claims to be a
replacement for jack and pulseaudio but jack1 and jack2 coexist, does it
replace jack1 or 2?

m.

On 04.02.21 23:31, Brent Busby wrote:
> This subject seems to come up occasionally...
>
> What is the current best practice with regard to Jack classic versus
> Jack 2? It's usually said that Jack 2 is optimized for SMP, but it's
> hard to find a machine these days that isn't SMP. Maybe the two
> projects are merging because of this?
>
> Because, Jack 1 hasn't gone away. In fact, the only version of
> jack-audio-connection-kit currently in Gentoo (no overlay) has a version
> string of 0.125.0-r1, and I presume that's Jack 1. I've got a local
> overlay with 1.9.12 that I've been using, so I can fight this of
> course...but should I? Is everyone being advised to move to Jack 1 now?
> For what it's worth in deciding, I prefer not to use dbus for control
> (or for anything at all, when I can avoid it), and I'm using QJackCtl as
> a frontend.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Feb 13 04:15:02 2021

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Feb 13 2021 - 04:15:02 EET