This is just touching on a few of your points from this and from
previous messages...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2021, Sam Kuper wrote:
[...]
> I was more productive using an old 1/2" 16-track, a Seck 1882 or a Ramsa
> DA-7, and a few multi-FX rack units, than I was after switching to
> proprietary software!
For many reasons, I'm still mostly using hardware even now (and yes, I
know that's a choice). I remember back in Ardour's 1.x-2.x days, the
Ardour web site used to say something like that Ardour was still
developing, and was currently not much better than a stack of ADAT
recorders. Well, I still record and produce about the same way I did in
1989 (but with more stuff now), so I thought, wow, that's all I need
Ardour to do, be like a stack of ADAT recorders! I've been happy with
it ever since, even now that it's become a whole lot better than a stack
of ADAT recorders.
As far as productivity goes though, I've found that's actually related
more to how much stuff (hardware and software) there is to setup in your
studio at the beginning of a session, rather than whether it's
proprietary or not. (Projects like NSM help here, though I still
haven't started using its session management as much as I should.)
_Most_ software and physical equipment will start up with _most_ of its
settings either where you last left them, or at reasonable defaults.
The devil is in the "most" part...
_Some_ software needs you to spend time setting things up at the start
of your session. _Some_ equipment can't be powered on subsequent to or
simultaneous with certain other equipment. _Some_ equipment has
settings that don't get remembered at power-up, and sometimes this is
even true in equipment that actually does persistently keep most of the
other settings on the same device -- but not all the settings, leaving a
few settings that still need to be set every time that device is powered
on. The more stuff (hardware and software) you use in your studio, the
more of this "some" stuff you'll have in your startup routine, stuff
that doesn't _quite_ have everything ready to go when you start it, or
needs to have something else turned on first before you can power it up.
All of this conspires to make the dream of hitting a big master power
switch and double-clicking an icon to get started an impossible fantasy,
replaced instead with an initialization procedure that resembles
preparing for a rocket launch to the moon, complete with crew health
check and a final countdown as we check through all equipment and make
sure all systems are go for liftoff. And dude, you just wanted to jam,
ok? By the time you get done, you're more in the frame of mind to go
off in a corner and write something clever in Perl. The artistic moment
is lost (along with about 45 minutes of your life). I find this is true
not just with proprietary software, but any studio that just has a lot
of stuff in it -- any kind of stuff. I sometimes have fond memories of
an ESQ-1, a Mirage, an RX7 drum machine, and a 4-track tape recorder,
maybe a delay pedal on an effects loop. So primitive, so easy to get
stuff done on...and no rediculous setup ritual that takes over half an
hour and leaves you feeling like a rocket scientist.
> These days, I see buying proprietary music software as being a bit like
> hiring a piece of boutique audio hardware. If you truly need it for
> that project, it might be indispensable; but you'd better hope you don't
> need it again in a few years' time because it might be unavailable. So,
> it's always wise to look for a more sustainable solution first;
> proprietary software, like boutique unobtainium, should be a last
> resort.
My studio is all about boutique unobtainium. :)
> Personally, the only pieces of proprietary music software that I still
> find tempting are Ableton Live and RME TotalMix. But I'm hoping I can
> assemble just enough libre or DIY workarounds to be able to do without
> them, until comparable (or better!) libre alternatives emerge.
Have you tried hdspmixer? It's a partial clone of TotalMix, but I don't
think it works with all RME products. It works very well with my
Multiface II though.
Going back to something you said in an earlier message about having to
surrender Wavelab and other software from Windows: I find that Wine
actually does surprisingly well with that sort of thing, especially
lately. The days when Wine could barely run WIN16 Solitaire are long
gone. These days, there is a whole cult of people who run very
demanding first person shooter games with it, hardware-accelerated 3D
and all. It will see your local ALSA MIDI devices and display them in
the Windows app as though it were running native on your desktop.
My gripe with Wine for music is that there is still no MIDI support for
WIN16 (Windows 3.1) programs. I have a lot of very old equipment, and
some of it actually is supported by ancient WIN16 programs. I'm sure
the developers are concentrating on what most users want, and that's
probably not MIDI support for Windows 3.1 stuff.
Anyway, I generally agree: If I were to base my studio around
proprietary software on a proprietary OS, that would be just one more
thing that I'd be depending on keeping functional over time, in addition
to all the vintage equipment. At least the gear has soul, but I'm
pretty sure that Windows has never had one.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Feb 15 04:15:03 2021
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 15 2021 - 04:15:03 EET