Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc.
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc.
From: Paul Barton-Davis (pbd_AT_Op.Net)
Date: Sat Jul 22 2000 - 19:46:21 EEST
- Next message: Paul Barton-Davis: "[linux-audio-dev] the ICube and Linux"
- Previous message: Iain Sandoe: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
- In reply to: Iain Sandoe: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
- Next in thread: Maarten de Boer: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
- Next in thread: Iain Sandoe: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
- Reply: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
- Reply: Maarten de Boer: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
>I'm doubly confused... I was under the impression that SMPTE resolved to
>"bits" which are 1/80th of a frame (at whatever frame rate we are using)...
Ah. OK. I've used SMPTE-via-MTC so far, and I've never managed to find
specs on the analog version of the signal. I assumed that SMPTE was
limited to the same resolution as was represented in the MTC stream.
Apologies if this is wrong.
>i.e. approx. 0.5 ms
but still pretty weak as a timebase for positioning an audio stream, eh ?
--p
- Next message: Paul Barton-Davis: "[linux-audio-dev] the ICube and Linux"
- Previous message: Iain Sandoe: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
- In reply to: Iain Sandoe: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
- Next in thread: Maarten de Boer: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
- Next in thread: Iain Sandoe: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
- Reply: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
- Reply: Maarten de Boer: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] MTC, SMPTE, etc."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28
: Sat Jul 22 2000 - 20:20:31 EEST