Subject: [linux-audio-dev] RFC: reply-to address default to LAD (was: Re: Reply-To)
From: Jörn Nettingsmeier (nettings_AT_folkwang.uni-essen.de)
Date: Thu Mar 16 2000 - 12:54:22 EST
as james suggested, i would propose to ask the list maintainer to
have the "reply-to:" address default to
linux-audio-dev_AT_ginette.musique.umontreal.ca, so that replies do not
exclusively reach the sender but the whole list.
replies to the list are more common than private ones, so i'd vote
to change the default.
please comment on this.
yours,
jörn
ps: james, i have brought up this before, no reaction.
i have added "RFC" to the subject. hopefully, this will get
attention :)
James McCartney wrote:
>
> Is there any good reason that this list does not have a Reply-To address
> going back to the list? This is the only mailing list out of many I'm on
> that is like this, and consequently I always out of habit mistakenly send to
> the poster and not the list.
>
> --- james mccartney james_AT_audiosynth.com <http://www.audiosynth.com>
> SuperCollider - a real time synthesis programming language for the PowerMac.
> <ftp://www.audiosynth.com/pub/updates/SC2.2.7.sea.hqx>
-- Jörn Nettingsmeier Kurfürstenstr. 49 45138 Essen, Germany
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Mar 16 2000 - 20:49:11 EST