Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] rough rough ladspa docs
From: David Benson (daveb_AT_idealab.com)
Date: Sun May 14 2000 - 21:23:35 EEST
> Now we should just keep on promoting LADSPA,
> and convince people to use LADSPA rather than app-specific APIs. This
> doesn't seem to be easy (still only a handful of LADSPA aware apps),
> but got to keep on trying...
Yes, but don't worry. Frankly there are advantages
with fewer hosts in the short term: now is a good time
to really flush out ladspa before it has to break its back
doing back-compatibility.
For example, I am going to propose a semantical
change for LADSPA_PROPERTY_HARD_RT_CAPABLE
soon. The amended comment is merely:
The plugin will not block on I/O.
I'd also like to make LADSPA_PROPERTY_INPLACE_BROKEN
the default and cut the flag.
As you are one of the few host authors, I'm quite
interested in your feedback.
Thanks,
Dave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun May 14 2000 - 21:51:30 EEST