Subject: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA: snd, hosts, malloc
From: Richard W.E. Furse (richard_AT_muse.demon.co.uk)
Date: Mon May 15 2000 - 02:37:17 EEST
Ooo. That'll be me - but I failed to get snd to compile on my box when I
had a quick try this afternoon. I'm sure it's obvious to others, but I'm
missing a file (Xm/XmAll.h) that I don't recognise. Shouldn't be a big
problem...?
I've been a bit quiet recently (busy with other thing - don't ask), but I'm
now also looking at helping out with LADSPA support for a couple of other
hosts. If your program wishes to host LADSPA but you've not got your head
around it just yet you might like to email me - it's very easy. There are a
couple of other useful LADSPA things probably happening soon.
Incidentally, on the malloc side, I think some people should take a little
more time reading the API: it isn't wrong - it just doesn't tell you how to
make memory management work, so a little imagination has to be used. If the
host is written sensibly to use cleanup() and the plugin writer is
responsible (this is attempted by the CMT library at
http://www.muse.demon.co.uk/cmt) there is no need for memory leakage.
-- Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Barton-Davis [SMTP:pbd_AT_Op.Net]
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 8:43 PM
To: Paul Winkler
Cc: linux-audio-dev_AT_ginette.musique.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour & snd: the saga begins
>I know you've talked about these features, but any idea of
>approximately when we might see
>
>1) LADSPA plugin support in snd / ardour?
No idea. Someone has volunteered to do this, but out of courtesy, I'll
leave it them to reveal themselves if they want to. The work
will/should be done in the mainline snd code; my stuff doesn't alter
the guts of snd at all, and Bill has already said that he'd like to
see LADPSA support in snd.
[...]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon May 15 2000 - 02:58:11 EEST