Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage
Subject: Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage
From: Paul Barton-Davis (pbd_AT_Op.Net)
Date: Tue Nov 14 2000 - 14:19:31 EET
- Next message: Paul Winkler: "[linux-audio-dev] test, ignore"
- Previous message: Steve Harris: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- In reply to: David Olofson: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- Next in thread: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- Next in thread: Steve Harris: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- Reply: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- Reply: David Olofson: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
>> Then there are the busses. Each is functionally an N-input, 1-output
>> adder.
>
>Not really. The bus is actually just a buffer where a bunch of
>plugins have mixed down all of their output. Throw it at any plugin
>input for further processing.
As long as LADSPA does not require the run_adding() method to be
present, busses cannot be implemented in this way. This is another
good reason for requiring that all plugins support this, IMHO. VST
didn't where it did today, etc. etc. (oops, most of you probably won't
catch that reference to the old BBC series "The Rise and Fall of
Reginald Perrin).
--p
- Next message: Paul Winkler: "[linux-audio-dev] test, ignore"
- Previous message: Steve Harris: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- In reply to: David Olofson: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- Next in thread: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- Next in thread: Steve Harris: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- Reply: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
- Reply: David Olofson: "Re: Plugin chains and EDLs, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28
: Tue Nov 14 2000 - 14:55:55 EET