Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and run_adding()
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Nov 17 2000 - 13:34:58 EET
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 10:24:57AM +0100, David Olofson wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Paul Barton-Davis wrote:
> > i would really like to once again voice my opinion that run_adding()
> > should be the default mode of operation for all LADSPA plugins.
>
> ++votes;
votes++;
Stupidly enough none of mine implement it at all, I was dead set against
implemnting two slightly different methods, and run() seemed like the
best option, but with the benfit of heinsight I'm going to move
everything to run_adding(), as it's only a tiny bit slower, and provides a
superset of run().
I might implement run() for very fast+simple plugins as the extra speed
might be worthwhile there. Now all I need is a host that implements
run_adding(), obeys input range hints and allows real control values.
I'l probably doctor applyplugin.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Nov 17 2000 - 14:23:30 EET