Re: [linux-audio-dev] discussion about development overlap

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] discussion about development overlap
From: Kai Vehmanen (kaiv_AT_wakkanet.fi)
Date: Fri Sep 29 2000 - 03:11:08 EEST

Next message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] disk i/o latency, mmap and more (was: Re: Reverbs... and the usual whinings)"
Previous message: Ellis Breen: "Fw: [linux-audio-dev] SAOL/Quasimodo"
Next in thread: Juhana Sadeharju: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] discussion about development overlap"
Maybe reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] discussion about development overlap"

On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, David Benson wrote:

>> Ok, I'll go back to my old example: using ecasound as an fx box for
>> soundtracker. Is this kind of functionality already possible with GDAM?
> That's only because we don't define *any* policy of
> what to do with midi events.

Ah, I should have described the situation better. Midi isn't involved here
at all - it's all pure audio (audiostream from st to eca).

-- 
 . http://www.eca.cx ... [ audio software for linux ] /\ . 
 . http://www.eca.cx/sculpscape [ my armchair-tunes mp3/ra/wav ]

Next message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] disk i/o latency, mmap and more (was: Re: Reverbs... and the usual whinings)"
Previous message: Ellis Breen: "Fw: [linux-audio-dev] SAOL/Quasimodo"
Next in thread: Juhana Sadeharju: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] discussion about development overlap"
Maybe reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] discussion about development overlap"

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Sep 29 2000 - 09:34:04 EEST