Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LCP v0.1.0
From: Tim Goetze (tim_AT_quitte.de)
Date: Mon Dec 10 2001 - 23:50:59 EET
Steve Harris wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:57:30 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> For no param change rate this cost will be greater than the communication
>> cost involved anyway.
>
>Welll... cost is a bit of a vague term. HTTP has both higher latency
>(slightly), computational cost (greatly), complexity (massivly).
>
>You could argue in favour of an HTTP implementation that wasn't propper
>HTTP, but then where's the point?
>
>My view of some protocols, in order of roughly how appropriate I think
>they are for this problem:
>
>LCP:
>+ fast
>+ simple
>+ we allready have exemplar code
>- not an existing standard (does that matter?)
votes[LCP]++;
tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 23:55:16 EET