Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec status?
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 23 2001 - 13:06:33 EET
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:49:06PM +0100, David Olofson wrote:
> > Also I'm mildly sceptic to gui toolkit dependencies INSIDE of a
> > plugin.
>
> So am I. From a plugin POV, it sucks, but as LADSPA doesn't have the
> interfaces required for requesting the host to load a file from disk
> and make it available to the plugin, there's not much point in
> throwing in "string ports" - and fixing both issues in a useful way
> would probably eliminate the "S".
Oh, absolutly. LADSPA should be left as it is. Its not a very common thing
to want to do, and so hard to deal with cleanly.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Feb 23 2001 - 13:34:12 EET