Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 27 2001 - 13:17:45 EEST


On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 04:54:09AM +0900, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> Richard Dobson said:
>
> >and, wherever possible, ensure that the most frequently performed tasks
> >(which may be the most argued-over parameter, of course) require the
> >least number of steps. A sub-menu requires at least four, possibly five
> >steps:
>
> How difficult would it be to add a statistical analysis function to the
> program which tracks the most used menu items and organises them into a
> seperate menu specifically for the most used items?

Nnnnnnnnooooooooooooooooo!

That way lies madness. Have you used win2k? I find it really anoying.

- Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Jul 27 2001 - 12:35:01 EEST