Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA API Proposal

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA API Proposal
From: Paul Davis (pbd_AT_Op.Net)
Date: Thu Jun 14 2001 - 02:53:30 EEST


>> Yes, your right, they are not very portable. But read/write can't work
>> without horrendous complexity unless you have fd passing, which is
>> also not portable. But you're also right that its not part of the API,
>> so we don't have to worry too much.
>
>You're forgetting Unix socket/named pipe alternative.

To use that, clients would have to be told to open/close their
connections every time the graph changed. This adds an extra cost to
the whole graph reconfiguration process that seems undesirable right
now. However, I agree that it would work.

--p


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jun 14 2001 - 05:04:30 EEST