Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] License Concerns about ladspa.h and GPL programs
From: Stefan Westerfeld (stefan_AT_space.twc.de)
Date: Fri Mar 02 2001 - 02:19:15 EET
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 10:47:30AM +1100, Conrad Parker wrote:
> Richard, Paul, Stefan: could you *please* make the redistribution/licensing
> terms of ladspa.h more explicit? It is currently not Open Source, and
> cannot be distributed eg. in Debian.
For me, one of the following { BSD, LGPL, GPL } would be fine, in decreasing
order of preference. Not that I dislike GPL ;-) - it's just that a plugin
API should be as widely useable as possible, and BSD seems to be the least
restrictive.
Paul? Richard?
Cu... Stefan
-- -* Stefan Westerfeld, stefan_AT_space.twc.de (PGP!), Hamburg/Germany KDE Developer, project infos at http://space.twc.de/~stefan/kde *-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Mar 02 2001 - 02:35:28 EET