Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] License Concerns about ladspa.h and GPL programs
From: Paul Davis (pbd_AT_Op.Net)
Date: Fri Mar 02 2001 - 08:29:08 EET
>> Richard, Paul, Stefan: could you *please* make the redistribution/licensing
>> terms of ladspa.h more explicit? It is currently not Open Source, and
>> cannot be distributed eg. in Debian.
>
>For me, one of the following { BSD, LGPL, GPL } would be fine, in decreasing
>order of preference. Not that I dislike GPL ;-) - it's just that a plugin
>API should be as widely useable as possible, and BSD seems to be the least
>restrictive.
I'd be happy with a BSD license, but I'd prefer LGPL. But definitely
not GPL, since that might complicate things at some point in ways we
don't want.
--p
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Mar 02 2001 - 08:47:39 EET