Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] alsamixer+ardour
From: Frank Carmickle (frankiec_AT_c1422183-a.ross1.pa.home.com)
Date: Fri Mar 02 2001 - 17:41:33 EET
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Paul Davis wrote:
> it must be said, however, that ecasound might be a better place for
> you to start from. kai's done some great work there, and even though
> the model he has is not the same one as ardour is built around, it
> might be more suitable for your purposes.
Looking at this question from amount of cpu usage. Which would be the
best way to go? I know that we are really going to be putting what ever
machine we do this on through a lot of processing tasks. 24 channels
mixed live with eq and compression and some reverb. I am planning on
building a box based around the dual thunderbird boards that I believe are
coming out next week. But still accomplishing this is not going to be
simple or maybe even possible.
Frank
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Mar 02 2001 - 17:58:47 EET