Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - avoiding fragility

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - avoiding fragility
From: Iain Sandoe (iain_AT_sandoe.co.uk)
Date: Fri May 04 2001 - 14:43:35 EEST


This is not a new concern (to the general topic) - and some possible ways
round it have been mooted in previous discussion. I bring it up here in
case anyone thinks that the API needs to accommodate provisions for it.

==

In the case that a process has SCHED_FIFO - if an element in that process
crashes it can lock up the entire machine. Taking us back to the kind of
problem that people criticise MacOS/'doze for.

One solution is to have a separate process monitoring the server and killing
it if it locks up.

Is there a better way?
should provision for this be part of the API?
(or integral to the server).

Iain.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri May 04 2001 - 15:23:33 EEST