Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] Re: laaga, round 2
From: Abramo Bagnara (abramo_AT_alsa-project.org)
Date: Tue May 08 2001 - 19:00:51 EEST
Paul Davis wrote:
>
> >We need an architecture that move interest of developers from to write
> >an application to write a component, this is IMO a fundamental thing.
> >
> >Often I feel that Paul is too focused on a single
> >problem/application/solution
>
> This is certainly possible. But if its true, then I think you should
> have a good explanation for why Steinberg's approach (3 different
> API's for different tasks) was taken. Was it lack of time? Lack of
> concern for the future? Stupidity?
>
> When I look at other audio application environments, I see
> monoliths+plugins. I this just a hangover from the lack of The Unix
> Way(TM) on Windows and MacOS? Or is it based on some real
> understanding of how best to go about this?
In my opinion we need hard to try to find why they've made this choice,
but if we're unsuccessful we *have* to decide independently from that.
-- Abramo Bagnara mailto:abramo_AT_alsa-project.orgOpera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy
ALSA project http://www.alsa-project.org It sounds good!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue May 08 2001 - 19:25:08 EEST