Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] questions to be resolved
From: Abramo Bagnara (abramo_AT_alsa-project.org)
Date: Tue May 22 2001 - 01:24:36 EEST
Karl MacMillan wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 May 2001, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
>
> > >
> > > This has a large number of unnecessary buffer copies that probably will
> > > not scale well. Have you looked at the other proposals that reduce buffer
> > > copying?
> >
> > Buffer copies?? Are you sure to have followed the thread?
> > We are speaking about controls (in this specific case connections map).
> >
>
> Ooops - you are right I misunderstood the context.
>
> > I've two copy of a topology area every time user change it, this makes
> > you worry?
> >
>
> Hmmm . . . after thinking about this further I still don't understand how
> this solves the problem that Paul was raising (I looked over the context
> of these emails).
I've simply presented a better way to solve the same problem (Paul
presented a solution too).
The general problem was "how to change engine work parameter from the
external without to force an engine stop, without to mess engine structs
with partially written settings, in an efficient way".
-- Abramo Bagnara mailto:abramo_AT_alsa-project.orgOpera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy
ALSA project http://www.alsa-project.org It sounds good!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue May 22 2001 - 01:44:07 EEST