Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: minimum tick time

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: minimum tick time
From: Paul Davis (pbd_AT_Op.Net)
Date: Sat Nov 10 2001 - 23:23:38 EET


>shmat(2) claims to try to find an area in the unmapped range (1-1.5GB)
>when not given an address to try.
>
>unfortunately, it doesn't do that. instead, it ends up using an

it does, of course. i was being loose with my words. what it doesn't
do is operate properly with the ld.so, it also doesn't do what the man
page claims, which is start at 1.5GB and come down from there.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Nov 10 2001 - 23:22:36 EET