[linux-audio-dev] Re: more bad low latency results

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: more bad low latency results
From: Maarten de Boer (maarten.deboer_AT_iua.upf.es)
Date: Thu Nov 15 2001 - 13:35:16 EET


Takashi Iwai <tiwai_AT_suse.de> wrote:
> Hmm, I'm using an Athlon 600 MHz and got promising results even with
> it. You can find the results (on different conditions) under
> http://alsa-project.org/~iwai/latency-results/2.4.12
> The result with all LL-patches is found in ll-all directory.

Yes, that really looks good.
What do you man with "all" LL-patches?
And what do you mean with VM-tuned? Where can I find information
about that?

> The kernel was based on SuSE's 2.4.12, which is mostly equivalent with
> AA-patch.

What is the AA-patch? Andrew Mortons' ?

> FS is reiserfs. Compiled with ARCH_M586.

do you mean the kernel configuration,
CONFIG_M586=y
?

What soundcard do you use?

Maarten


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 13:26:04 EET