Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: more bad low latency results
From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea_AT_suse.de)
Date: Fri Nov 16 2001 - 18:21:10 EET
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:41:58AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:39:23 +0100,
> Maarten de Boer wrote:
> >
> > Takashi Iwai <tiwai_AT_suse.de> wrote:
> > > I think 2.4.14 or 15pre are ok, too. The same LL patch should work.
> >
> > I applied the 2.4.15pre1AA patch on 2.4.14 (with some very small
> > modifications), and the results are horrible.
are you sure the very small modifications are obviously correct? Why
aren't you applying it on top of 2.4.15pre1?
Could you give me some more detail rather than just the latency, isn't
the tool also reporting the EIP of the high latency paths?
thanks,
Andrea
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Nov 16 2001 - 18:18:19 EET