Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA revisited (was: LAAGA and supporting programs)
From: Richard W.E. Furse (richard_AT_muse.demon.co.uk)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2001 - 22:23:08 EEST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu
> [mailto:owner-linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Karl
> MacMillan
> Sent: 29 September 2001 23:37
> To: linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA revisited (was: LAAGA and
> supporting programs)
[...]
> It is certainly true that there is only one type of "exchange" currently
> written for JACK, and that is for low-latency PCM. This does not mean that
> the API is not suitable for other types of connections, though. I think
> the beauty of the JACK API is that the clients have so few
> responsibilities, which actually makes it easier to provide different
> backends. I would certainly be interested in some specific cases that you
> think cannot be handled by the JACK api - as Paul said, now is a good time
> to talk about these issues.
>
> Karl
[....]
Hmmm, LADMEA is written to be as short as possible with little/no
redundancy, possibly at the slight expense of performance. Which features do
you think LADMEA has that aren't necessary (other than the Codec spec which
is a bit of an appendix)?
--Richard
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Oct 02 2001 - 22:22:18 EEST