Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Specs ?
From: xk (xk_AT_myrealbox.com)
Date: Mon May 13 2002 - 01:15:50 EEST
> Well - LADSPA is as it is now, i.e. _S_imple. And I like it being that
> way. Its use is limited to certain applications, but usually you can live
> with that.
I think it can be simple without being limited.
Like the VST SDK, which is easy to use for a simple synth, but can also
support stuff like surrond sound and offline processing if the plugin maker
can handle it.
Parameter envelope is handled in the DirectX SDK (and thus Cakewalk DXi) by
a handfull of functions and structures. It's very easy to implement after
you study the docs a little and can do amaizing things (like automating a
filter cutoff in Sonar without all that stepping sound speciffic to discrete
parameter values).
--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon May 13 2002 - 01:11:48 EEST