Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA v1.1
From: Tim Hockin (thockin_AT_hockin.org)
Date: Tue May 21 2002 - 05:50:38 EEST
> useless? steve's set plus ardour as the host (or possibly other apps)
> provides me with a very rich working environment. there are very few
> issues i have with LADSPA right now that are not shared by VST (for
> example). the main ones would be the lack of string parameters and the
> inability to use LADSPA plugins easily in a non-streaming/realtime
> context. it has provide something for linux audio that wasn't there
> before, and it has met just about every goal that was ever set for
> it. simple, yes. useless, not even close.
No need to get on the defensive, really. I don't deny the usefulness or
importance of LADSPA _AT_ALL_. It is, by and large, a very good system.
Yeeeesh - I have some different ideas that I want to play out, that is all.
Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue May 21 2002 - 05:46:46 EEST