Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA v1.1
From: Kai Vehmanen (kaiv_AT_wakkanet.fi)
Date: Tue May 21 2002 - 12:25:10 EEST
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Richard Bown wrote:
> Tim Hockin wrote:
>> No need to get on the defensive, really. I don't deny the usefulness or
>> importance of LADSPA _AT_ALL_. It is, by and large, a very good system.
> Well why don't you stop being such a dick and just get on with it rather
> than posting under-informed, inflammatory comments?
Ok guys, calm down a bit. As has been already stated, new
ideas and proposals are always welcome here. But
it's also good to remember that creating a widely
used API is a bigger task than writing a technically
good API. You need a bit of social engineering
to get people on your side, or even just to get
them to go through your proposal in detail.
Downplaying the meaning of previously done
work of this group (search for "LADSPA" at
www.eca.cx/lad and you'll get thousands of
matches) is not a good way to start your campaign.;)
Anyways, new ideas (and members!) are always
welcome. And I'd also like to maintain the
relaxed atmosphere that this list has. There has
never been a real flamewar here - let's keep
it that way.:)
-- http://www.eca.cx Audio software for Linux!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue May 21 2002 - 12:25:13 EEST