Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] meterbridge 0.0.4
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Sat Oct 05 2002 - 00:44:55 EEST
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:22:47 +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> This might be a good addition. In any case using pids is not optimal.
> This is basicly the same problem as with port names. Either we maintain
> two sets of names (one for programs, one for the user-interfaces) or
> make a compromise and have something that is usable for both. Requiring
> users to map the application instances to pids does not fill this
> requirement.
I hadn't thought about having two names. That wouldn;t totaly solve the
borblem though, as youd still want unique, easy to read names for the long
name.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Oct 05 2002 - 00:55:40 EEST