Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ann] unmatched - a LADSPA amp tone
From: Tim Goetze (tim_AT_quitte.de)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 14:26:41 EEST
Lea Anthony wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 01:12, Tim Goetze wrote:
>> Lea Anthony wrote:
>>
>> >Have you guys heard amplitube? Man, those sounds rock!
>>
>> haven't heard it yet, no.
>>
>> if you happen to use it, it'd be very interesting to hear
>> how much cpu load the different sub-modules generate.
>
>It's a windows app so I don't know how much extra overhead windows adds
>on per submodule. Getting a pure cpu usage for the submodules will be
>hard, but an approximation is not much of a problem.
graphics should not be a problem (bitmap blits don't
create relevant cpu load on recent systems). a rough
figure for the system's total cpu load for every effect
running on its own (if that is possible) would be a good
start.
if you don't run "ms access" or other busy-waiting apps
in the background the system part of the cpu load should
be negligible.
>Also, I must ask this, how much of the LAD stuff is designed with 32bit
>audio in mind? I ask because that's what I work in, then dither down to
>16bit when mastering.
most of what i do is 64 internally and 32 for inter-module
exchange.
tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Oct 24 2002 - 14:39:32 EEST