Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] Looking for some PR stuff related to Jack
From: Ivica Bukvic (ico_AT_fuse.net)
Date: Mon Nov 11 2002 - 05:34:59 EET
> as you can hopefully see, things start to get more and more and more
> complex. its not impossible to do this, but its hard, and i have much
> more important things on my mind than re-engineering the 80,000 lines
> of Ardour's code to make an in-process version possible.
>
> --p
>
So, I presume it is impossible to get let's say an i-p version of Jack
running that can accept both i-p and o-o-p connections (so for instance
Ardour would be o-o-p, while freqtweak i-p)?
If this were possible, then the clients could harness the potential of
low-latency Jack, while more complex apps like Ardour would have a kind
of a compromise. Would this be feasible?
Alternately, you spoke of o-o-p being just not reliable enough. What
aspect of Linux needs to improve in order for o-o-p to become as
reliable as i-i-p?
Thanks for all the valuable info!
Ico
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Nov 11 2002 - 05:40:51 EET