Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)
From: Kjetil S. Matheussen (k.s.matheussen_AT_notam02.no)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 20:24:10 EET

On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
>
> > Tim Hockin wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated that an
> > > > > instrument API must not support it?
> > > >
> > > > Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies
> > > > that LADSPA will still be simpler.
> > >
> > > yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to
> > > ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins. That is very important.
> >
> > Linux Audio Developers' More Sophisticated Plugin API (=LADMSPA) ? :-D
> >
> LADLUP - Linux Audio Developers' Less Unsophisticated Plugin API.
>
BAPULDAL - Linux Audio Developers' Less Unsophisticated Plugin API Backwards. 

--

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Dec 09 2002 - 20:30:20 EET